Author Topic: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?  (Read 11275 times)

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« on: January 04, 2005, 09:11:00 PM »
comon nath waddya say? ;)

Offline Chichiri

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Chichiri66
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2005, 11:40:35 PM »
If one more person complains about posting and specificly post counts i will find out where they live and shove their post count up there ass. I'm sick of this, get over post counts everybody "THEY DON'T MATTER".
« Last Edit: January 04, 2005, 11:40:52 PM by Chichiri »
Watch it.
Excel Saga

Offline Chichiri

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Chichiri66
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2005, 11:43:49 PM »
No offense to you Doofer. I mean in general.
Watch it.
Excel Saga

Offline Tea-cup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2005, 12:24:20 AM »
Quote
comon nath waddya say? ;)
[snapback]14833[/snapback]
Those games that are allowed in random rating serieusly are spam. That setting isn't done for fun  <_<  Also I don't think postcounts matter that much. Makes this poll well placed in random rating for me. (as it could have been posted in feedback)

There are still things (spam) like those 'babe' threads, so I do understand this poll somewhat, but the setting like they are now are fine and with a reazon.

Btw, this is a nice follow up for the comments about cab's low postcount. Lets see how this poll will turn out, can be interesting.

-Mel

Offline Celestial1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
    • AOL Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2005, 03:02:39 PM »
1) Cab would jump up to like... 200+ posts. :P
2) Random ranting + post count? SPAMtastic.

Edit: He only would have 83... I was sure he posted a lot damn more. o.o

~Celestial
« Last Edit: January 05, 2005, 03:04:13 PM by Celestial1 »
Yes I know... I have no idea why these random animals are carrying 148 gold and a magic fire ring. It will be forever a mystery![/span]

[span style=\'color:green\']It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

-Samuel Langhorne Clemens, Mark Twain.

unterdude

  • Guest
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2005, 03:07:00 PM »
GO DIE!



-Jesse



PS: Have a nice day. :)

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2005, 11:26:16 PM »
Quote
PS: Have a nice day. :)
thank you i will Mr. Lurker with 0 posts :)

Offline Blood Angel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1514
    • MSN Messenger - Blood Angel
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2005, 07:39:40 AM »
sure :)
"Some birds aren't meant to be caged,
their feathers are just too bright.
And when they fly away,
the part of you that knows it was a sin to lock them up does rejoyce.
But still,
the place you live in is that more drab an empty that they're gone.
I guess I just miss my friend."
-The Shawshank Redemption

LucidMagic
High Elf of Doriath
Alliance of Magi
Chill Touch of The Cold Alliance

Blood Angel, �§oulkeeper, Dawn The Lionheart and Shadowblade.

unterdude

  • Guest
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2005, 04:56:45 PM »
You're quite welcome, doofer. >:o I'm Nathan's friend in RL, I only joined 'cause of his constant bitching :D.

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2005, 07:06:48 PM »
lol.

well at least the more the merrier
except for the 5 ppl who voted "fuck that"... little harsh dontcha think? :P

Offline Chichiri

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Chichiri66
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2005, 10:01:12 PM »
I'm a whole hearted fuck that fan.
Watch it.
Excel Saga

Offline Wobbles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 248
    • View Profile
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2005, 06:50:53 PM »
You fuck hearts?!
I like to chew on things.

Offline Anheg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2417
    • View Profile
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2005, 07:54:52 PM »
Quote
You fuck hearts?!
[snapback]15277[/snapback]
I hope you are kidding :huh:
My PS3 Game Library:
Call of Duty 4, Guitar Hero 3, Mirrors Edge, Motor Storm, Resistance 2, Rock Band 2, Soul Calibur 4, Valkyria Chronicles

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2005, 07:45:25 PM »
you guys suck.

Offline BzK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
    • ICQ Messenger - 122117799
    • MSN Messenger - flatleymike@hotmail.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - LoRdOfTeHDaNcE
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - bzk04
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2005, 07:51:05 PM »
Oh yeah, let's give the doofer more reason to post like Gashmo! <_<

I R :wub: MY POST COUNT!!!!!!!!!!!1111

 :closedeyes:
« Last Edit: January 12, 2005, 07:51:52 PM by BzK »

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #15 on: January 12, 2005, 09:52:56 PM »
Quote
Oh yeah, let's give the doofer more reason to post like Gashmo! <_<
sure, why the hell not? :P

Offline Celestial1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
    • AOL Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #16 on: January 13, 2005, 09:14:03 AM »
Because I'd have to throw you in a box.
"BOYCOTT DOOFER'S TOPICS NOW!"

PS. I hate spam. Even fried.

~Celestial
Yes I know... I have no idea why these random animals are carrying 148 gold and a magic fire ring. It will be forever a mystery![/span]

[span style=\'color:green\']It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

-Samuel Langhorne Clemens, Mark Twain.

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #17 on: January 13, 2005, 09:03:08 PM »
Quote
I hate spam. Even fried.
:o you hate fried spam!?

Offline Celestial1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
    • AOL Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #18 on: January 14, 2005, 12:19:18 PM »
Yes. And this is why Random Ranting will never count posts.

ANNIHILATE!

~Celestial
Yes I know... I have no idea why these random animals are carrying 148 gold and a magic fire ring. It will be forever a mystery![/span]

[span style=\'color:green\']It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

-Samuel Langhorne Clemens, Mark Twain.

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #19 on: January 16, 2005, 10:18:06 PM »
well thats ok, cause here at rand ranting, we only serve spam cooked over an open fire so it is tender and juicy... just like grandma used to make :D

Offline Anheg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2417
    • View Profile
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #20 on: January 16, 2005, 11:53:04 PM »
Quote
well thats ok, cause here at rand ranting, we only serve spam cooked over an open fire so it is tender and juicy... just like grandma used to make :D
[snapback]15829[/snapback]
id rather have to broiled
My PS3 Game Library:
Call of Duty 4, Guitar Hero 3, Mirrors Edge, Motor Storm, Resistance 2, Rock Band 2, Soul Calibur 4, Valkyria Chronicles

Offline Celestial1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
    • AOL Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #21 on: January 17, 2005, 12:20:32 PM »
Spam bites all the time. Which is why I really want to close this topic.

"You have no chance to survive make your time"!

~Celestial
Yes I know... I have no idea why these random animals are carrying 148 gold and a magic fire ring. It will be forever a mystery![/span]

[span style=\'color:green\']It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

-Samuel Langhorne Clemens, Mark Twain.

Offline Chichiri

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Chichiri66
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #22 on: January 17, 2005, 02:05:25 PM »
The problem with closing this topic and others like it is upon seeing it closed some jackass will open another topic exactly like it. So wouldnt you rather have one place for people to talk about this, instead of hundreds of one lined closed topics?
« Last Edit: January 17, 2005, 02:06:37 PM by Chichiri »
Watch it.
Excel Saga

Offline Tea-cup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #23 on: January 17, 2005, 02:48:35 PM »
Quote
The problem with closing this topic and others like it is upon seeing it closed some jackass will open another topic exactly like it. So wouldnt you rather have one place for people to talk about this, instead of hundreds of one lined closed topics?
[snapback]15862[/snapback]
He didn't close it, did he? I think he's just saying how irritating he finds this thread. And he has a point in this thread beeing "junk".

Allowing postcounts in random rating would mean less freedom to post what you want in here, as moderators and admins will keep a closer look for spam and other flooding. Even if it's not to get more postcount. Now it's somewhat allowed withing the limits.

This isn't what you want either doofer, I don't see the point in trying to get postcount highering in here.

-Mel

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #24 on: January 17, 2005, 06:28:01 PM »
actually i made this thread because of blood's sickeningly high post count, and also because of mine and cab's abnormally low post count, and just to see how many people wanted change... guess not that many

ps
blood should be hung :P

Offline Tea-cup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #25 on: January 18, 2005, 01:48:30 AM »
Quote
actually i made this thread because of blood's sickeningly high post count, and also because of mine and cab's abnormally low post count, and just to see how many people wanted change... guess not that many

ps
blood should be hung :P
[snapback]15870[/snapback]
I did get almost 500 posts in 3 months. And tell me when you see me spamming or anything close ot it.  :P

I think the current settings on postcount in random ranting are fine, Postcounts only give an idea how active you're on the forum, and I think most poeple think cab has more posts in random ranting than he actualy has.

Ah, and I'm not saying you don't may make a poll here. I just give my oppinion.

-Mel

Offline Celestial1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
    • AOL Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - n1megakid92
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #26 on: January 18, 2005, 08:36:01 AM »
Thanks Mel.

It was a joke on the serious side... Don't like this topic a bit but I won't close it... yet. :P

~Celestial
« Last Edit: January 18, 2005, 08:36:23 AM by Celestial1 »
Yes I know... I have no idea why these random animals are carrying 148 gold and a magic fire ring. It will be forever a mystery![/span]

[span style=\'color:green\']It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

-Samuel Langhorne Clemens, Mark Twain.

Offline doofer101

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
    • http://
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #27 on: January 23, 2005, 08:24:13 PM »
And i quote:
Quote
Postcounts are only an indicator how active you are.
so if your active in random ranting are you not also active on this site?

EDIT: Whoa is it just me or has the poll disappeared? :blink:
« Last Edit: January 23, 2005, 08:25:34 PM by doofer101 »

Offline Tea-cup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
« Reply #28 on: January 24, 2005, 02:30:18 PM »
Quote
And i quote:
Quote
I did get almost 500 posts in 3 months. And tell me when you see me spamming or anything close ot it.  :P

I think the current settings on postcount in random ranting are fine, Postcounts only give an idea how active you're on the forum, and I think most poeple think cab has more posts in random ranting than he actualy has.

Ah, and I'm not saying you don't may make a poll here. I just give my oppinion.

-Mel
[snapback]15889[/snapback]


so if your active in random ranting are you not also active on this site?

EDIT: Whoa is it just me or has the poll disappeared? :blink:
[snapback]16409[/snapback]
Nah, it means you're not active in forumparts where postcount counts. Logical no?

Dunno about the poll.

-Mel