1
WoW General / What Realm do you play in?
« on: June 04, 2005, 03:49:47 AM »
60 Rogue
52 Shaman
25 Druid
23 Mage
52 Shaman
25 Druid
23 Mage
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
sorry im babbling/spamming on so much :/ im bored and dont have anyone to talk to (im permanently in a witness protection programme and i live in the swiss alps - i have 16 female bodyguards and none of them speak english. in fact i dont even see them more than once a quarter, they are green beret types)[snapback]13254[/snapback]
QuoteQuite frankly I don't think anyone should disable certain abilities because they think they are cheap... Everything has a counter.. For instance.. Remove Blindess.. or Dispel gets rid of WoF... Gust of Wind/Dispel gets rid of SoV/You can cast energy buffs to take absolutly 0 damage from Hellball.. I think it would be more productive for people to stop complaining and start thinking..[snapback]8179[/snapback]
I find it interesting that everyones solution for combating "cheap" tactics is to use a spell caster...
Some of us don't want to only use spell casters for duels.
People think that putting restrictions above and beyond GodSpire rules will limit builds. The truth is, by restricting "cheap" tactics, you open up a whole world of new builds that weren't viable before because they don't have access to Remove Blindness, Dispel, Gust of Wind and "Energy Buffs".
Sorry, but that is just the truth, restricting "cheap tactics" unrestricts dueler builds, it's simple logic.
-420[snapback]8200[/snapback]
Well, I'll say it again. I formed it to find other interesting ways to duel, Rather than the same old shit day in day out.
and my idea was to have a duel using nothing more than buffs and standard damaging spells melee etc. No sneaking or any Dissabling spells, Knocking down is okay but once per duel.
But spells such as, WoF, Hell Ball or SoV etc arnt to be used, As WoF Blinds Hell Ball cant be resisted and SoV stuns.
It was just an idea people took in all directions other than what it was intended.
-Xen[snapback]7997[/snapback]
Ok... just to make the DE forum a bit more lively... I'd like to take this time to welcome back some members of Divine Exaltation
-AlwaysCoyote (who's been back for weeks now)
-WarElephant (who just got back like two weeks ago I guess)
-Ludo Kressh (who was recently reinstated back in tonight)
in my opinion, all three exemplify good skill in dueling
Welcome back and make DE proud![snapback]7606[/snapback]
Why do you think I stopped playing? I got tired of dueling Mo, over and over.
Mo is..the greatest opponent anyone could ever want, but after duel number 2,044, even dueling Mo loses it's "fun value".[snapback]7682[/snapback]
I swear my loyality to Doriath. If Adisku accepts it I will put up most that I can to make him win this. I will fight at your side for whatever cost Adisku. I now hold to the alliance that myself and JeK once declared! Now, only under a new name... Marauders, underdestimating will be your lose.[snapback]4113[/snapback]
what's your favorite fucking music?[snapback]6636[/snapback]
Cold...QuoteDude, calm down*Shakes fist at Cab*
ooo, you! Now I'm going to invade your country... oh wait, that's another thread.
-420
You speak for everyone else I suppose when you say everyone else is willing to do this.. considering your the only one that is responding now..QuoteIf you honestly want me to dig months and months back to find articles proving my statements are factual I would, but as much people already know I am busy as hell..
The rest of us are willing to do this, so unless you are going to put in the same amount of effort to defend your beliefes, don't even bother arguing because you can't (or won't) prove your point.QuoteI don't really understand were you got this thought from.. but I am not accusing people of name calling simply because they simply oppose my point of view...QuoteDo I sense irrationality?? I think he hates me because I don't agree with him... what has this world come to..
Now you are just contradicting yourself, looks like I pay more attention to what you say than you do Ludo.QuoteDid I say you called me an idiot? No.
What I said if you would look closely... "people" Meaning it could be.. or it could not be you...
Uh, you did quote my post when you said people were pointing out that you were an "idiot". So, yes, you were implying that I was the one calling you an idiot.Quote"idiot" persay which would mean.. it is a substitute for a long series of words such as illiterate, ignorant, etc. Which in fact many people on this forum have called me such names.
Once again you contradict yourself, in the very next sentence you imply I am indeed calling you an "idiot" which is a "substitute of a long series of words such as illiterate,ignorant." (btw, get a fucking dictionary, idiot and illitereate and ignorant are vastly different words, just because they all start with "i" doesn't mean you can substitute them for one another)QuoteMake me bad by using facts? hardly..
At this point I don't even need to try to make you look like a fool, you are doing a better job of it than I ever could.
-420
Lets analyize this statement here..QuoteOk fine.. maybe I didn't know the exact meaning of "warmonger".. ok my mistake there...QuoteYep.. I have been in and started so many wars I can't even count them on my fingers..Warmonger - One who advocates or attempts to stir up war.
Advocate - v. To speak in favor of. n.1. One who argues for a cause. 2. One who pleads in another's behalf.
Get a dictionary Ludo, I swear it's people like you that perpetuate the feeling that Bush and his supporters are illiterate and ignorant.
-420
From the times I had heard the word "warmonger" used in certain contexts.. it sounded similiar to someone who stirs up wars 'for no reason'.. just because they can..
So fine, I am a warmonger concerning this Iraqi war.. because I do support it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illiterate
a. Unable to read and write.
b. Having little or no formal education.
Well then if I am illiterate.. how am I even responding to these posts?.. Ignorant in this situation maybe.. because I "was" mis-informed...
We all make mistakes.. but I suppose if I am not perfect.. people tend to reap the oppurtunities to point out that I am an "idiot" persay because I made a simple mistake... quite sad.
My quotes have no factual basis..QuoteGet a dictionary Ludo, I swear it's people like you that perpetuate the feeling that Bush and his supporters are illiterate and ignorant.Oh, poor Ludo, once again I must make you look bad by using facts.
I never called you an "idiot" so I have no idea where you get off quoting a word I never said.
The quoted sentence above means that your statements, which have no factual basis, make people think that Bush supporters are uneducated. There may be a valid reason that Bush should remain president but nothing you have said about Bush has any basis in reality. While we post links to actual news articles you just say the first thing that comes to your mind, insist it is fact, and expect us to just believe it.
All the while, you continually accuse the people who oppose your point of view of name calling, never posting one bit of evidence to back up anything you are claiming about the Bush administration. If you actually are interested in an intelligent debate, why don't you insert some intelligence into it?
-420
No, they're pointing out you are an "idiot" because you think George W. Bush knows what he's doing.I suppose you speak for them now?
Ok fine.. maybe I didn't know the exact meaning of "warmonger".. ok my mistake there...QuoteYep.. I have been in and started so many wars I can't even count them on my fingers..Warmonger - One who advocates or attempts to stir up war.
Advocate - v. To speak in favor of. n.1. One who argues for a cause. 2. One who pleads in another's behalf.
Get a dictionary Ludo, I swear it's people like you that perpetuate the feeling that Bush and his supporters are illiterate and ignorant.
-420
Keyword "threat"....QuoteWe wiped out every possible terrorist threat in Afghanistan...Honestly man, do you read the news?
This CNN article on recent terrorist activity in Afganistan is barely 2 months old.
When I read Ludo's comment that I quote above, I realized I had to bow out of the discussion. To quote the First Law of Debate: "Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference."
-Throbblefoot
Great posts Cab! Thank you.Yep.. I have been in and started so many wars I can't even count them on my fingers..
Ludo, you are, what is commonly called a "warmonger", no wonder you like Bush so much!
It just occured to me that some people are missing a vital bit of information:
George W. Bush Jr. orchestrated the 9/11 attacks as a reelection strategy. That's why he was so upset that he wasn't allowed to use images of 9/11 for his reelection or run campaign commercials featuring the 9/11 attacks.
End of fucking story.
-420