Author Topic: New Computer (Read 32844 times)

Razor Blade · « **on:** September 20, 2007, 07:15:52 PM »

So if I bought the following setup

INTEL Core 2 Quad Q6600
ANTEC SONATA 500 Watt
MSI P35 Neo-FI motherboard with Firewire connection
2 GB DDR2 800Mhz memory
Samsung 500GB SATA
MSI 8800GTS 320MB Game 3d-card
20x DVDRW Dual layer SATA met
33-in1 Card Reader Intern
Windows Vista Home Premium 64bit Nederlands

would I be able to let's say run all new games like Bioshock at high or medium detail and the games that are coming (Assasins Creed, Chronicles of Spellborn, GTA 5, etc) also run on high or at least medium detail...?

Tyrael · « **Reply #1 on:** September 20, 2007, 08:14:28 PM »

Man... youre joking right?, with that pc you could even play at more than max settings xD, i can already run Bioshock at max settings with my pc and its way lower than that:

AMD Athlon 64 3500+
2.5gb RAM
Radeon X1900GT

So yeah you wouldnt have any problem i think.

Mo · « **Reply #2 on:** September 20, 2007, 08:49:41 PM »

I would not go with the quad core. Your pc will hardly make use of the extra processing power. If I were you, and I was a few months ago when I bought my new computer, I'd get a Core 2 Duo 6350 and overclock that to around 3ghz. With the money saved from the quad-core get 2 more GB of RAM.

You also might want to go with the 640MB Nvidia. If it's not too much more.

Lastely I'd go with x2 smaller HDs like 320GB in RAID0

cuchulann · « **Reply #3 on:** September 21, 2007, 02:11:52 AM »

Quad core has finally arrived on the civilian market eh? Well that took a good decade to happen.

Soul Sojourner · « **Reply #4 on:** September 21, 2007, 06:35:28 PM »

Quote

I would not go with the quad core. Your pc will hardly make use of the extra processing power. If I were you, and I was a few months ago when I bought my new computer, I'd get a Core 2 Duo 6350 and overclock that to around 3ghz. With the money saved from the quad-core get 2 more GB of RAM.

You also might want to go with the 640MB Nvidia. If it's not too much more.

Lastely I'd go with x2 smaller HDs like 320GB in RAID0
[snapback]37586[/snapback]

Eh, either that or get it and just have your computer not go "out of date" for that much longer.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #5 on:** September 21, 2007, 06:41:43 PM »

heh you see the problem is i'm buying a pc that's allready assembeld, because I have no time myself to assemble a pc (working in shifts + in weekends) and frankly i'm not feeling up to it anymore.

I don't know i'm feeling kinda "safer" to go for quad core cuz well face it like Hell said in a few months or maybe a year even a quad core will be outdated lol.
As for the HDD and the 3D-card I can always replace them with better ones.

Mo · « **Reply #6 on:** September 21, 2007, 06:57:01 PM »

Quote

heh you see the problem is i'm buying a pc that's allready assembeld, because I have no time myself to assemble a pc (working in shifts + in weekends) and frankly i'm not feeling up to it anymore.

I don't know i'm feeling kinda "safer" to go for quad core cuz well face it like Hell said in a few months or maybe a year even a quad core will be outdated lol.
As for the HDD and the 3D-card I can always replace them with better ones.
[snapback]37594[/snapback]

You can always replace a dual core with a quad core later for cheaper than replacing an old video card with a newer one. Games won't be truely multi-threaded for a couple of years yet.

Mo · « **Reply #7 on:** September 21, 2007, 08:37:40 PM »

Anyway with Vista you'll be better off with 4GB of ram than a quad core. It uses lots of memory. I started with 2GB than bought another 2GB a couple weeks later.

Meclar · « **Reply #8 on:** September 22, 2007, 03:08:47 AM »

How much for all those do-dads?

Razor Blade · « **Reply #9 on:** September 22, 2007, 07:16:47 AM »

Quote

How much for all those do-dads?
[snapback]37599[/snapback]

Well the complete setup I placed in my first post it comes to a total of 1049Ã¢?Â¬ wich is according to a site 1470$ checked it on two sites and both give the same amount so yup 1470$

Mo · « **Reply #10 on:** September 22, 2007, 02:34:28 PM »

Quote

heh you see the problem is i'm buying a pc that's allready assembeld, because I have no time myself to assemble a pc (working in shifts + in weekends) and frankly i'm not feeling up to it anymore.

I don't know i'm feeling kinda "safer" to go for quad core cuz well face it like Hell said in a few months or maybe a year even a quad core will be outdated lol.
As for the HDD and the 3D-card I can always replace them with better ones.
[snapback]37594[/snapback]

Thats no problem you can customize the computer on their site no?

Razor Blade · « **Reply #11 on:** September 22, 2007, 04:12:50 PM »

Quote

Thats no problem you can customize the computer on their site no?
[snapback]37604[/snapback]

yup, you can it's a computer store so I suppose you can say wich parts you wan't in the pc and all, but the setup i choose there looks pretty good and I think i'm gonna go with it maybe i'll just change the 3d-card with more memory but for the rest i'm pretty happy.

Soul Sojourner · « **Reply #12 on:** September 22, 2007, 07:08:31 PM »

Quote

You can always replace a dual core with a quad core later for cheaper than replacing an old video card with a newer one. Games won't be truely multi-threaded for a couple of years yet.
[snapback]37595[/snapback]

Aye, doing it sooner rather than later just saves you the trouble later on, and that's about it.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #13 on:** October 06, 2007, 07:35:10 PM »

hmm...

I just saw a laptop that will be available this wendsday and it doesn't look bad

it's a HP DV9530EB
-intel core 2 duo T7300
-2GB DDR2 ram
-HDD 320Gig sata
-nvidia geforce 8400M 128mb
-Wi-Fi

is it a good choice for a laptop that will be used mostly for gaming purposes and will it last for at least 2 years and be able to run games at medium detail?

Why a laptop? because well it takes up less room and when you're away on holiday you can take it with you and all...

Mo · « **Reply #14 on:** October 06, 2007, 07:51:03 PM »

I'm really not sure what constitutes "medium detail", but laptops lack in two very important areas.

1)HDs are normally 5400rpm which are very slow.
2)Mobile video cards are pretty bad. Espcially an 8400

Razor Blade · « **Reply #15 on:** October 06, 2007, 08:42:17 PM »

Quote

I'm really not sure what constitutes "medium detail", but laptops lack in two very important areas.

1)HDs are normally 5400rpm which are very slow.
2)Mobile video cards are pretty bad. Espcially an 8400
[snapback]37873[/snapback]

thanks for the info, I don't know i always had a desktop and a laptop looks more convienent and I wan't a pc that i can take with me on travels...

Mo · « **Reply #16 on:** October 06, 2007, 08:50:17 PM »

Quote

thanks for the info, I don't know i always had a desktop and a laptop looks more convienent and I wan't a pc that i can take with me on travels...
[snapback]37874[/snapback]

Get a PC in a portable case with a handle.

Mercy · « **Reply #17 on:** October 06, 2007, 08:59:26 PM »

Hypersonic sells them.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #18 on:** October 08, 2007, 01:34:39 PM »

Ok what about this laptop then

Intel core 2 duo processor type: T7300
2048mb ddr-2 ram
GeForce 8600 M 512mb
320Gig HDD

good enough?

Mo · « **Reply #19 on:** October 08, 2007, 09:48:31 PM »

Quote

Ok what about this laptop then

Intel core 2 duo processor type: T7300
2048mb ddr-2 ram
GeForce 8600 M 512mb
320Gig HDD

good enough?
[snapback]37892[/snapback]

Better but the video card still sucks for gaming.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #20 on:** October 09, 2007, 12:26:18 PM »

Quote

Better but the video card still sucks for gaming.
[snapback]37900[/snapback]

WTF? wich one then doesn't?

420 · « **Reply #21 on:** October 09, 2007, 12:46:25 PM »

Quote

WTF? wich one then doesn't?
[snapback]37909[/snapback]

Mo's just being a hard-ass. I use a GeForce 7900 GS 512MB and I can run Bioshock, Enemy Territory: Quake Wars and Hellgate: London at 1280X1024 with most, if not all, graphics cranked up.

-420

Soul Sojourner · « **Reply #22 on:** October 09, 2007, 01:53:40 PM »

I'd go with a DDR 3 if you can score one, but that's not a necessity or anything.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #23 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:07:59 PM »

Quote

Better but the video card still sucks for gaming.
[snapback]37900[/snapback]

lol Mo wtf man I posted on countless forums, asked everyone I know that I know they know smt about pc's and all said to me one thing, that the one that said that this card sucks for gaming is a freaking idiot lol everyone says that this laptop is pretty good and if I wanted a "gaming" laptop this one is pretty good for it too...

Mo · « **Reply #24 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:35:17 PM »

Quote

lol Mo wtf man I posted on countless forums, asked everyone I know that I know they know smt about pc's and all said to me one thing, that the one that said that this card sucks for gaming is a freaking idiot lol everyone says that this laptop is pretty good and if I wanted a "gaming" laptop this one is pretty good for it too...
[snapback]37932[/snapback]

I've been building computers for 10 years, so probably longer than those people on your forums have been alive for. The 8600s are a low end gaming cards. Nvidia is releasing the 8800GT as their mainstream gaming card next month.

Read any review on the 8600GT or GTS and you'll see they are only mediocre gaming video cards. Now the one you have there is a mobile version, so thats even a slower clocked version (ie. worse for gaming).

An Nvidia 7900 would be a better choice for performance than an 8600 but you'll lose DX10.

Anyway it's your choice. if you only care about medium to low settings then go ahead.

I'm currently using an ATI HD2600PRO that would be around the performance of your card there. It's fine for games like Guild Wars and NWN and newer games at low res (maybe your laptop has a low res screen). But if you want high res gaming forget about it.

check this page out www.gpureview.com

Soul Sojourner · « **Reply #25 on:** October 10, 2007, 06:59:34 PM »

Look it over at Newegg.com while you're at it, if they have it in stock. There's alot of reviews on there, and good information.

Way to go, Mo.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #26 on:** October 11, 2007, 12:28:42 PM »

Quote

I've been building computers for 10 years, so probably longer than those people on your forums have been alive for. The 8600s are a low end gaming cards. Nvidia is releasing the 8800GT as their mainstream gaming card next month.

Read any review on the 8600GT or GTS and you'll see they are only mediocre gaming video cards. Now the one you have there is a mobile version, so thats even a slower clocked version (ie. worse for gaming).

An Nvidia 7900 would be a better choice for performance than an 8600 but you'll lose DX10.

Anyway it's your choice. if you only care about medium to low settings then go ahead.

I'm currently using an ATI HD2600PRO that would be around the performance of your card there. It's fine for games like Guild Wars and NWN and newer games at low res (maybe your laptop has a low res screen). But if you want high res gaming forget about it.

check this page out www.gpureview.com
[snapback]37933[/snapback]

Well there are laptops with a nvidia 7900 but i wan't the DX 10 possibility so that's why I wan't a geforce 8600, besides I don't mind gaming on medium detail, most games I play are RPG's and they don't require that much of your system.

And if 420 can run Bioshock on a GF 7900 with max settings why couldn't mine?

Mo · « **Reply #27 on:** October 11, 2007, 12:40:10 PM »

Performance is subjective. What I find as acceptable performance will differ from you. So go ahead and buy the laptop and let us know. I'm sure you'll be happy. I run games at 1600x1200 resolution, I'm sure your laptop has lower resolution. So as long as you don't use AA or AF you should be ok.

420 · « **Reply #28 on:** October 11, 2007, 12:53:26 PM »

Anti Aliasing and Antistropic Filtering is crap! Makes it look like someone spread Vaseline all over my monitor.

When I say all options cranked to max I don't mean AA or AF because they are shite!

-420

Razor Blade · « **Reply #29 on:** October 11, 2007, 01:59:47 PM »

Quote

Performance is subjective. What I find as acceptable performance will differ from you. So go ahead and buy the laptop and let us know. I'm sure you'll be happy. I run games at 1600x1200 resolution, I'm sure your laptop has lower resolution. So as long as you don't use AA or AF you should be ok.
[snapback]37941[/snapback]

lol i'm used to games on a 800x600 settings i only play GW at a higher resolution and AA and AF lol dunno when I last used them.

Also forget the say today i got a promotion at work so i'll need a laptop for work now.

News:

Author Topic: New Computer (Read 32844 times)