Yes, I am an asshole. And you dubbed yourself one as well, what is your point?
Talking about how being insulting and being an asshole are the same is what the original discussion topic was. 420 told me these were the same, I agreed, which is why I said before him, that that is why I said those type of people, who are insulting (also considered assholes), are probably less likely to be insulted by most of the insults non-insulting people (people who are not assholes) are.
So essentially, 420 told me they were the same, which would only further my point, not argue against it, but told me he disagreed as well. He could disagree with my statement as it was, with my putting something in there that was not so fully detailed as to be specific per person, but he disagreed with the other part, which is more or less a contradiction on his part.
Then he nitpicked on the fact that I said "one in the same" after he said "one and the same" which is completely irrelevant to the points previously brought up. He implied that this is my mis-reading, when in fact, that is how I always thought it was said and pronounced it, because "in" sounds like "and" when said lazily, and with the way my parents speak (calling Washington Worshington, and grocery growshery etc.) it was easy for me to learn some things, such as this, incorrectly. However, he assumed this as a mis-reading of his own statement. I read it correctly, I just said it how I knew it. Simple as that.
Sorry for the run-ons, bad habit.
So... what were your points again 420? Or are you still just agreeing with me?
