Author Topic: System Requirements for NWN2? (Read 17403 times)

Meclar · « **on:** May 16, 2006, 07:15:08 PM »

It's probably been posted and I did take a look but I didin't see anything on the system requirements of NWN2. I'm slowly improving my computer so if anyone knows it'd be nice to share.

420 · « **Reply #1 on:** May 16, 2006, 07:26:33 PM »

From NWVault front page:

Quote

Obsidian CEO Feargus Urquhart has posted the minimum specs for NWN2 on the GameSpot forums for what NWN2, as of right now. Looks like you'll definitely need a very decent video card. Here's the post.

Minimum, right now, is looking like a 2.4GHz P4, 512MB of RAM, NVidia 5600Ultra or ATI 9500pro or better and broadband for multiplayer.

Feargus Urquhart
CEO
Obsidian Entertainment, Inc.
www.obsidianent.com

What do you know, it's Throbble's computer's exact specs! Oh wait, she's got a big 1 Gig of RAM. KAPOW!

-420

Mo · « **Reply #2 on:** May 16, 2006, 07:46:34 PM »

Boardband for multiplayer? Oh Oh...I think they forget most people still use dial-up....Guess they didn't optimize the game for low bandwidth. That's would be a mistake.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #3 on:** May 17, 2006, 12:13:53 PM »

why are people still using dial-up while obviously broadban internet is much faster and cheaper....

Anheg · « **Reply #4 on:** May 17, 2006, 12:34:54 PM »

Its good to know the minimum req, but...I'm good to go!

Throbblefoot · « **Reply #5 on:** May 17, 2006, 12:51:23 PM »

Quote

why are people still using dial-up while obviously broadban internet is much faster and cheaper.... [snapback]28905[/snapback]

Strange as it may seem, there are still places where you can't get broadband of any kind.

-Throbblefoot

420 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 17, 2006, 11:12:44 PM »

Good news everyone, the minimum system requirements have officially been lowered:

Quote

Recommended:
- 3 GHz Intel Pentium 4 or equivalent processor
- 1GB System Ram
- ATI Radeon X800 series, NVIDIA GeForce 6800 series or higher video card

Minimum System Requirements:
- Windows XP
- 512MB System RAM
- 2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 or equivalent processor
- 128MB Direct3D compatible video card with DirectX 9.0c compatible driver
- CD-ROM or DVD-ROM drive
- 4.6GB free hard disk space
- DirectX 9.0c (included)
- DirectX 8.1 compatible sound card
- Microsoft .NET 2.0 Framework for toolset (included)
- Broadband connection for multiplayer online play
- Keyboard, Mouse

Supported Video Cards:
- ATI Radeon X1900 series
- ATI Radeon X1800 series
- ATI Radeon X1600 series
- ATI Radeon X1300 series
- ATI Radeon X850 series
- ATI Radeon X800 series
- ATI Radeon X700 series
- ATI Radeon X600 series
- ATI Radeon X300 series
- ATI Radeon 9800 series
- ATI Radeon 9600 series
- ATI Radeon 9500 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 7900 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 7800 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 7600 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 7300 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 6800 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 6600 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 6500 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 6200 series
- NVIDIA GeForce 6100 series
- NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 series
- NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 series
- NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 series
- NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 series

Other info regarding NWN2: Link

-420

Razor Blade · « **Reply #7 on:** May 18, 2006, 12:11:07 PM »

WOHOOO nice system specs i was worried they were gonna go Oblivion if that was the case i would have needed to upgrade my system totally.
Anyway the system i'm using should handle it without problems, therefore i can still keep up the schedule to buy a new pc next year

I only hope the single player campaign is MUCH better then the first one...

Soul Sojourner · « **Reply #8 on:** May 18, 2006, 12:21:18 PM »

Even my specs are better than the first minimum spec requirements. Doesn't look like I'll have an issue. Although my video card is better than that, is still screwy, so I will still update it later.

Broadband cannot get everywhere just yet no. Although supposedly, anyone can get sattelite internet. Thing is, it is expensive as f***. They take advantage of the fact that certain locations are unable to get broadband. Which I noted someone said was cheaper than dial-up, and it isn't. Dial-up is cheaper. You get what you pay for.

Throbblefoot · « **Reply #9 on:** May 18, 2006, 12:41:26 PM »

Quote

Broadband cannot get everywhere just yet no. Although supposedly, anyone can get sattelite internet. [snapback]28932[/snapback]

Actually, that's not the case. My brother lives 100 miles east of Fresno and he can't even get cell phone reception. No satellite anything for him, either.

-Throbblefoot

Soul Sojourner · « **Reply #10 on:** May 18, 2006, 03:22:28 PM »

Quote

Actually, that's not the case. My brother lives 100 miles east of Fresno and he can't even get cell phone reception. No satellite anything for him, either.

-Throbblefoot
[snapback]28937[/snapback]

Well, the only requirement I know of is "You must have a clear view of the southern sky." Other than that, I wouldn't know what makes his location so... "remote." Seems the proper word.

Mo · « **Reply #11 on:** May 18, 2006, 04:01:25 PM »

Quote

Well, the only requirement I know of is "You must have a clear view of the southern sky." Other than that, I wouldn't know what makes his location so... "remote." Seems the proper word.
[snapback]28938[/snapback]

He obviously lives ontop of an ancient metorite. I've had that problem in the past. Silly things make receiving anything nearly impossible.

Razor Blade · « **Reply #12 on:** May 18, 2006, 04:42:20 PM »

Quote

get sattelite internet
[snapback]28932[/snapback]

what is the difference between satelite internet and broadband??

Talon · « **Reply #13 on:** May 18, 2006, 04:56:49 PM »

Quote

someone said was cheaper than dial-up, and it isn't. Dial-up is cheaper.
[snapback]28932[/snapback]

Yes it is. Especially so in the UK.

Personally, I dont even have a phone line - the line rental on a phone line would cost more than my broadband connection. Plus I would have to pay for the internet connection on top.
All my phone calls are routed over the internet at a fraction of traditional phone costs.

It would cost be more than twice as much for dial up access as i pay for broadband.

If you have a phone line, and are willing to pay a nominal fee, you can actually get completely free broadband in the UK. (the fee is to bolt-on inclusive local and national calls - we dont get free phonecalls in the UK)

So - to correct you, broadband is cheaper than dislup.

Talon · « **Reply #14 on:** May 18, 2006, 05:01:34 PM »

Quote

what is the difference between satelite internet and broadband??
[snapback]28941[/snapback]

Ther are two kinds of satellite internet connection.
One in which you have a satellite transciever, in that your connection upstream and downstream is via satellite, and at broadband speeds. There is usually an inherent latency involved with even modern satellite systems which generally mean its not suitable for gaming.

Another is when you have a satellite reciever coupled with a modem. In this, your upstream is sent via the modem, and you download via the satellite.

So - to answer your question - there is no difference between one form of satellite connection and a typical 'broadband' (you probably meant to say DSL/Cable) connection.

My guess is that on your budget, the only satellite solution available to you would be the second one i mentioned. They typically wa in at the same price as a typical small-business cable connection

Mo · « **Reply #15 on:** May 18, 2006, 05:17:43 PM »

Quote

So - to correct you, broadband is cheaper than dislup.
[snapback]28942[/snapback]

Maybe in EuroDisneyland where everything is merry and backwards it is

Talon · « **Reply #16 on:** May 18, 2006, 05:55:22 PM »

Quote

Maybe in EuroDisneyland where everything is merry and backwards it is
[snapback]28944[/snapback]

Yes - things are quite different here in the center of the world.

Throbblefoot · « **Reply #17 on:** May 18, 2006, 07:07:09 PM »

Everyone lets you keep Greenwich Mean Time and you assume it means you're the center of the world.......

-Throbblefoot

Mo · « **Reply #18 on:** May 18, 2006, 08:54:08 PM »

Let them keep their silly GMT. If they do then the center of the world will be some where around here.....A little wetter than London.

[attachment deleted by admin]

Talon · « **Reply #19 on:** May 19, 2006, 12:55:11 PM »

Quote

Let them keep their silly GMT. If they do then the center of the world will be some where around here.....A little wetter than London.
[snapback]28947[/snapback]

Dont be silly Mo.
Everyone knows the poles are in the wrong place.

Elessar Telrunya · « **Reply #20 on:** May 19, 2006, 01:44:23 PM »

oh you're all wrong, the center of the world looks a little like this!

[attachmentid=782]

-Elessar

PS: wow, i never though i'd use that texture again

[attachment deleted by admin]

Mo · « **Reply #21 on:** May 19, 2006, 03:03:59 PM »

Quote

oh you're all wrong, the center of the world looks a little like this!

[attachmentid=782]
-Elessar

PS: wow, i never though i'd use that texture again
[snapback]28953[/snapback]

Fine if you really want to get technical then you are wrong also. The center of the earth looks like lots and lots of this.

[attachment deleted by admin]

Throbblefoot · « **Reply #22 on:** May 19, 2006, 03:22:07 PM »

Quote

The center of the earth looks like lots and lots of this. [snapback]28954[/snapback]

Only much, much bigger. And rotating.

-Throbblefoot

Talon · « **Reply #23 on:** May 19, 2006, 06:06:51 PM »

Quote

oh you're all wrong, the center of the world looks a little like this!

[attachmentid=782]
-Elessar

PS: wow, i never though i'd use that texture again
[snapback]28953[/snapback]

Dont be dull.
Do you think the earth is round or something?
EVERYONE knows that its just an optical illusion caused by refraction of light from the ozone layer.

Geez, dont they teach you guys anything in school?

Talon · « **Reply #24 on:** May 19, 2006, 06:07:54 PM »

Quote

Fine if you really want to get technical then you are wrong also. The center of the earth looks like lots and lots of this.
[snapback]28954[/snapback]

That reminds me of the last time i ate a lot of treacle.

Mo · « **Reply #25 on:** May 19, 2006, 07:15:52 PM »

Quote

That reminds me of the last time i ate a lot of treacle.
[snapback]28960[/snapback]

Careful, people might be confused and think that's a requirement for playing NWN2

nathan · « **Reply #26 on:** May 25, 2006, 01:55:17 PM »

What would the minimum be for an amd cpu?

Mo · « **Reply #27 on:** May 25, 2006, 04:47:26 PM »

Quote

What would the minimum be for an amd cpu?
[snapback]28993[/snapback]

Probably Athlon 2000+ and higher

Razor Blade · « **Reply #28 on:** May 25, 2006, 06:57:51 PM »

heh good mine is 2400+

Psycho · « **Reply #29 on:** June 10, 2006, 03:54:52 PM »

Well I'm Going to Buy A new Comp
So I Can Play All The new games that come out and i want a good one so i don't have all those lagging things

News:

Author Topic: System Requirements for NWN2? (Read 17403 times)

Psycho