LucidMagic.net

Other => Random Ranting => Topic started by: doofer101 on January 04, 2005, 09:11:00 PM

Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 04, 2005, 09:11:00 PM
comon nath waddya say? ;)
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Chichiri on January 04, 2005, 11:40:35 PM
If one more person complains about posting and specificly post counts i will find out where they live and shove their post count up there ass. I'm sick of this, get over post counts everybody "THEY DON'T MATTER".
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Chichiri on January 04, 2005, 11:43:49 PM
No offense to you Doofer. I mean in general.
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Tea-cup on January 05, 2005, 12:24:20 AM
Quote
comon nath waddya say? ;)
[snapback]14833[/snapback]
Those games that are allowed in random rating serieusly are spam. That setting isn't done for fun  <_<  Also I don't think postcounts matter that much. Makes this poll well placed in random rating for me. (as it could have been posted in feedback)

There are still things (spam) like those 'babe' threads, so I do understand this poll somewhat, but the setting like they are now are fine and with a reazon.

Btw, this is a nice follow up for the comments about cab's low postcount. Lets see how this poll will turn out, can be interesting.

-Mel
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Celestial1 on January 05, 2005, 03:02:39 PM
1) Cab would jump up to like... 200+ posts. :P
2) Random ranting + post count? SPAMtastic.

Edit: He only would have 83... I was sure he posted a lot damn more. o.o

~Celestial
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: unterdude on January 05, 2005, 03:07:00 PM
GO DIE!



-Jesse



PS: Have a nice day. :)
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 05, 2005, 11:26:16 PM
Quote
PS: Have a nice day. :)
thank you i will Mr. Lurker with 0 posts :)
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Blood Angel on January 06, 2005, 07:39:40 AM
sure :)
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: unterdude on January 06, 2005, 04:56:45 PM
You're quite welcome, doofer. >:o I'm Nathan's friend in RL, I only joined 'cause of his constant bitching :D.
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 06, 2005, 07:06:48 PM
lol.

well at least the more the merrier
except for the 5 ppl who voted "fuck that"... little harsh dontcha think? :P
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Chichiri on January 06, 2005, 10:01:12 PM
I'm a whole hearted fuck that fan.
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Wobbles on January 10, 2005, 06:50:53 PM
You fuck hearts?!
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Anheg on January 10, 2005, 07:54:52 PM
Quote
You fuck hearts?!
[snapback]15277[/snapback]
I hope you are kidding :huh:
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 12, 2005, 07:45:25 PM
you guys suck.
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: BzK on January 12, 2005, 07:51:05 PM
Oh yeah, let's give the doofer more reason to post like Gashmo! <_<

I R :wub: MY POST COUNT!!!!!!!!!!!1111

 :closedeyes:
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 12, 2005, 09:52:56 PM
Quote
Oh yeah, let's give the doofer more reason to post like Gashmo! <_<
sure, why the hell not? :P
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Celestial1 on January 13, 2005, 09:14:03 AM
Because I'd have to throw you in a box.
"BOYCOTT DOOFER'S TOPICS NOW!"

PS. I hate spam. Even fried.

~Celestial
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 13, 2005, 09:03:08 PM
Quote
I hate spam. Even fried.
:o you hate fried spam!?
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Celestial1 on January 14, 2005, 12:19:18 PM
Yes. And this is why Random Ranting will never count posts.

ANNIHILATE!

~Celestial
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 16, 2005, 10:18:06 PM
well thats ok, cause here at rand ranting, we only serve spam cooked over an open fire so it is tender and juicy... just like grandma used to make :D
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Anheg on January 16, 2005, 11:53:04 PM
Quote
well thats ok, cause here at rand ranting, we only serve spam cooked over an open fire so it is tender and juicy... just like grandma used to make :D
[snapback]15829[/snapback]
id rather have to broiled
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Celestial1 on January 17, 2005, 12:20:32 PM
Spam bites all the time. Which is why I really want to close this topic.

"You have no chance to survive make your time"!

~Celestial
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Chichiri on January 17, 2005, 02:05:25 PM
The problem with closing this topic and others like it is upon seeing it closed some jackass will open another topic exactly like it. So wouldnt you rather have one place for people to talk about this, instead of hundreds of one lined closed topics?
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Tea-cup on January 17, 2005, 02:48:35 PM
Quote
The problem with closing this topic and others like it is upon seeing it closed some jackass will open another topic exactly like it. So wouldnt you rather have one place for people to talk about this, instead of hundreds of one lined closed topics?
[snapback]15862[/snapback]
He didn't close it, did he? I think he's just saying how irritating he finds this thread. And he has a point in this thread beeing "junk".

Allowing postcounts in random rating would mean less freedom to post what you want in here, as moderators and admins will keep a closer look for spam and other flooding. Even if it's not to get more postcount. Now it's somewhat allowed withing the limits.

This isn't what you want either doofer, I don't see the point in trying to get postcount highering in here.

-Mel
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 17, 2005, 06:28:01 PM
actually i made this thread because of blood's sickeningly high post count, and also because of mine and cab's abnormally low post count, and just to see how many people wanted change... guess not that many

ps
blood should be hung :P
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Tea-cup on January 18, 2005, 01:48:30 AM
Quote
actually i made this thread because of blood's sickeningly high post count, and also because of mine and cab's abnormally low post count, and just to see how many people wanted change... guess not that many

ps
blood should be hung :P
[snapback]15870[/snapback]
I did get almost 500 posts in 3 months. And tell me when you see me spamming or anything close ot it.  :P

I think the current settings on postcount in random ranting are fine, Postcounts only give an idea how active you're on the forum, and I think most poeple think cab has more posts in random ranting than he actualy has.

Ah, and I'm not saying you don't may make a poll here. I just give my oppinion.

-Mel
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Celestial1 on January 18, 2005, 08:36:01 AM
Thanks Mel.

It was a joke on the serious side... Don't like this topic a bit but I won't close it... yet. :P

~Celestial
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: doofer101 on January 23, 2005, 08:24:13 PM
And i quote:
Quote
Postcounts are only an indicator how active you are.
so if your active in random ranting are you not also active on this site?

EDIT: Whoa is it just me or has the poll disappeared? :blink:
Title: SHOULD RAND RANTING COUNT FOR POSTS?
Post by: Tea-cup on January 24, 2005, 02:30:18 PM
Quote
And i quote:
Quote
I did get almost 500 posts in 3 months. And tell me when you see me spamming or anything close ot it.  :P

I think the current settings on postcount in random ranting are fine, Postcounts only give an idea how active you're on the forum, and I think most poeple think cab has more posts in random ranting than he actualy has.

Ah, and I'm not saying you don't may make a poll here. I just give my oppinion.

-Mel
[snapback]15889[/snapback]


so if your active in random ranting are you not also active on this site?

EDIT: Whoa is it just me or has the poll disappeared? :blink:
[snapback]16409[/snapback]
Nah, it means you're not active in forumparts where postcount counts. Logical no?

Dunno about the poll.

-Mel