Dude, if you have a problem with the definition of "prove"
No, that's Re-tar-red.
[snapback]37036[/snapback]
I didn't say I had a problem with their definition of it, on the contrary, if it weren't for humans trying to make restrictions, laws, and order, we would be fucked... then again, half of us might not be lost to false reality... but... that would either mean that half would be insane, or somewhat like myself.
It's up to you to decide which is worse! Ahah!
It's not that my "ravings" are non-sensical, it's just that they are too sensible for you to make sense of, that's all. Though if I were to be technical, that's true and false at the same time, and there's other aspects as well, but I won't dwell on it.
Yes, thanks for clearing that up. He's still learning to read.